PART 2 OF A 3-PART SERIES
Ophthalmic Technician Continuing Education
Increasing Your Clinical Value:
Opportunities for Ophthalmic Technicians to Get Involved with Dry Eye Patients
By Marguerite McDonald, MD, and Matt Ruskin, BS, COA
Release Date: October, 2012
Expiration Date: September 30, 2013
Faculty/Editorial Board:
Marguerite McDonald, MD, and Matt Ruskin, BS, COA
Sponsors/Support:
Supported by an Independent Educational Grant from Allergan, Inc.
This course has been submitted to JCAHPO for consideration of CE credit.
This course is not sponsored by JCAHPO; only reviewed for compliance with JCAHPO standards and criteria and awarded continuing education credit accordingly; therefore, JCAHPO cannot predict the effectiveness of the program or assure its quality in substance and presentation.
Copyright 2012, Review of Ophthalmology®. All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in this supplement to Review of Ophthalmology do not necessarily reflect the views, or imply endorsement, of the editor or publisher. Copyright 2012, Review of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.
Affecting as much as 20 percent
of the North American population,1 dry eye goes by many names:
keratoconjunctivitis sicca, ocular
surface disease and tear film insufficiency. Our understanding of dry
eye syndrome has changed over
recent years: the condition was
previously thought to be due to
aqueous tear insufficiency, but we
now know that it is a multifactorial
disorder caused by inflammation of
the ocular surface that may involve
lacrimal gland, neurotrophic and
meibomian gland dysfunction
(MGD). Additional risk factors
include diet low in omega-3 fatty
acids1; use of medications such as
antihistamines, antidepressants1,
and diuretics1; radiation therapy;
hormone replacement therapy;
vitamin A deficiency; Hepatitis C
infection; and androgen deficiency.
I've even heard one corneal specialist espouse the idea that dietary
changes in cattle are at least partially responsible, since grass fed
beef contains much higher concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids, and
most cattle are now grain fed.
Any dysfunction of the lacrimal
functional unit, which is comprised
of the main and accessory lacrimal
glands; the meibomian glands;
eyelids; cornea; conjunctiva; goblet
cells; and the interconnecting
innervation, can contribute to it.
Environmental factors such as ciga
rette smoke, highly air-conditioned
or heated areas, chlorinated pools,
and even post alcohol consumption-related dehydration can also
exacerbate this common condition.
Fortunately for our patients, this
knowledge has opened the door to
the development of newer, more
effective treatments.
While one of the most common
disorders encountered by ophthalmologists, dry eye is also one of the
most misdiagnosed; it is often mistaken for other common external
eye diseases such as blepharitis or
allergy because dry eye symptoms
overlap with the symptoms of these
conditions. It can be associated
with inflammation of the surface of
the eye, the lacrimal gland or the
conjunctiva; any disease process
that alters the components of the
tears; an increase in the surface of
the eye, as in thyroid disease; and/
or cosmetic surgery, if the eyelids are opened too widely.2 Left
untreated, dry eye can lead to other
problems, such as corneal ulcers,
neovascularization, and scarring.
According to the National Institutes
of Health's National Eye Institute,
there are two types of dry eye:2
- Aqueous tear-deficient dry eye,
in which the lacrimal glands fail
to produce enough of the watery
component of tears to maintain a
healthy surface.2
- Evaporative dry eye, which
may result from inflammation of
the meibomian glands.2
Prevalence of Dry Eye
In 2000, a population-based study
of adults aged 48 to 91 years found
prevalence rates of 14 percent
overall. Though it was only eight
percent in those under 60 years, it
was as high as 19 percent in those
older than 80 years.3 As you will see
below, however, more recent studies indicate that the prevalence has
increased dramatically.
There is a higher incidence of dry
eye in patients with MGD4, older
age,5 females,5 postmenopausal
women,5 postoperative LASIK,
cataract/refractive surgery patients,5 and patients with systemic diseases
such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis
and rosacea.6
MGD is a chronic, diffuse abnormality of the meibomian glands,
often characterized by qualitative/
quantitative changes in the glandular secretion and/or terminal duct
obstruction. This may result in alteration of the tear film, symptoms
of eye irritation, clinically apparent
inflammation and ocular surface
disease.7 MGD can lead to alterations in the normal lipid composition in meibomian gland secretions8-11 and lipid abnormalities can
lead to abnormalities of tear film
composition and function, resulting
in evaporative dry eye.12 Whatever the cause, there is little doubt that
the prevalence and/or diagnosis of
dry eye is on the rise, particularly in
light of newly released data.
New data documenting the prevalence of dry eye at 60 percent
(Table 1) reinforce the fact that
the majority of our patients already
have dry eye.13 And as the population ages, we will spend more of
our time managing the condition
with every passing day. Without
the latest diagnostic and treatment
modalities, along with well-trained
technicians to help us, the situation
would be overwhelming.
Fortunately, this is a great time to
be working in the field of ophthalmology. Diagnostic and treatment advances in many areas have
brought relief from discomfort and
increased vision to more people
than ever before. One area in which
this is certainly applies is in the
case of dry eye.
Table 1. Prevalence of Hyperosmolarity in a General Patient Population
Interim analysis of TearLab prevalence study, 16 sites across Europe and the United
States so far.
- 582 subjects selected sequentially
- n=405 female, 177 male, age=51.7 ± 17.8, range = 14 to 97 years
- Overall, 60 percent of the patients had dry eye (349 subjects ≥ 308 mOsm/L)
- 62 percent reported symptoms of DED (358 subjects)
- 225 subjects had dry eye disease
- 133 subjects had some other form of ocular irritation
- 38 percent were asymptomatic (224 subjects)
- 124 had mild/moderate dry eye disease
- 100 were normal
- Normal subjects had an average inter-eye variability of 6.9 ± 5.5 mOsm/L
- Dry eye subjects had an average inter-eye variability of 17.3 ± 15.9 mOsm/L
These data are courtesy of TearLab; Interim Analysis: TearLab Prevalence Study |
Points to Keep in Mind
When addressing a dry eye
patient, remember that this condition can be quite debilitating and
can cause symptoms such as filmy
or blurry vision, fluctuating vision,
foreign body sensation, pain in the
eye, and even photophobia. It can
affect a patient's reading, computer
use, driving and television viewing.
Patients are generally frustrated
with this condition—specifically
because it simply has not been
addressed or because treatment
they received in the past have not
brought about significant improvement. A study that sought to
compile an overview of the burden
of dry eye found that dry eye symptoms become progressively troublesome and exert an increasing
burden on patients as the condition
progresses or increases in severity.14 The study researchers noted that
as dry eye symptoms become more
severe, additional aspects of life are
affected on a clinically meaningful level, including perceptions of
health, physical functioning and
social functioning.14 It is perhaps
understandable that dry eye has
gotten "short shrift" in our offices
in the past:
- There are no pathognomonic
symptoms for dry eye; most of them
overlap with other disease states.
- Until recently, there weren't
good diagnostic tests to detect
the earlier—though very vexing—
stages of dry eye (advanced dry eye
being fairly easy to diagnose).
- Until recently, there were only
palliative approaches to treating
dry eye; the first therapeutic agent
(cyclosporine emulsion) became
available only a few years ago.
- The profound impact of a pristine ocular surface on post-LASIK
and post-cataract surgery outcomes (especially those involving
multifocal IOLs) was only recently
demonstrated.
- Only recently has the profitability of a dry eye practice—including both the direct profits and the
indirect profits through the "halo
effect"—been documented.
It is now clear that dry eye management is an important, exciting,
and rapidly evolving field, but
ocular surface disease patients can
be time-consuming if you don't
have a streamlined system in place
and work as a team. Doctors and
staff who make a concerted effort
to develop an ocular surface disease
clinic will likely be highly rewarded
in terms of patient response and
practice growth.
The best practices are investing
from the top down: the ophthalmologists and their integrated optometrists are constantly educating
themselves on the new diagnostic
and therapeutic options through
meetings, peer-reviewed journals,
magazines, webinars and blogs.
What's more, they are committed to
providing educational opportunities
to their technicians; educated technicians enjoy more professional fulfillment, are proud of their "cutting
edge" doctors and practices, are
more loyal to the practice, and—as
the professionals with whom our
patients spend the most time—are
better suited to explain dry eye and
answer questions. Their knowledge
saves time for the doctors and
increases the patients' compliance.
Additionally, it has helped us foster
a better teamwork relationship
because the doctor and techs each
know their roles.
First Impressions
As the usual first point of patient
clinical contact, the technician's
role is an important one in the evaluation of dry eye. As a technician, it is your role to provide the physician
with the most information you can
access from your patient workup.
Patient history is an important
piece of the puzzle for the doctor in
making the diagnosis, so the role of
the ophthalmic technician is critical
in the dry eye practice.
Chief complaints containing symptoms such as "dry,"
"gritty," "irritated," "burning" and
"scratchy" eyes, as well as "blurry"
or "filmy" vision, and reports of
foreign body sensation are common
in dry eye patients. There are even
patients who report excessive tearing—especially late in the day—
who may, paradoxically, turn out
to have dry eye. Dry eyes recover
overnight, when the lids are closed.
When the eyes open again in the
morning, the dry spots on the
cornea (superficial punctate kera-titis, or SPK) slowly accumulate.
When a critical mass of SPK has
accumulated, the eye senses that it
has been injured and sends in the
"emergency" tears in an explosive
episode of tearing. These are not
the sought-after "baseline" tears;
these tears are a response to injury.
Patients often find it difficult to
understand why the doctor thinks
they have dry eye when they have
had explosive episodes of late afternoon/evening tearing. The technician can be invaluable in explaining
this phenomenon.
The patient's chief complaint
must be further investigated to
help determine causality. Previous
treatment for dry eye, a history
of contact lens wear, frequency
of typical symptoms, sensitivity
to environmental stimuli such as
smoke or high air-conditioning,
use of systemic medications such
as antihistamines and diuretics, a
history of systemic disease such as
Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid
arthritis, and other comorbid eye
problems such as MGD, glaucoma
and anterior or mixed blepharitis all
help point towards dry eye. All of
these conditions have been linked
to dry eye disease, either causally or
symptomatically.
The validated questionnaire is
an excellent tool for the collection
of subjective information and can
even be used prior to seeing the
patient. Just have them complete
one in the waiting room, or mail
it out with new patient material.
Patient responses are assigned
values, which allows for dry eye
severity to be scored, and later,
with subsequent questionnaires,
treatment effectiveness to be assessed. Two such questionnaires
in common use are the Ocular
Surface Disease Index (OSDI),
Allergan, and the McMonnies Dry
Eye Questionnaire.
Diagnostic Tests for Dry Eye |
The following list provides a look at some of the many technologies and methods available for detecting dry eye disease.
Tear film break-up time: measures the interval between the
last complete blink and the breakup of the tear film.
Corneal staining: (e.g., lissamine green, rose bengal, fluo-rescein) determines the surface ondition of eyes and the quality
of tears by staining loss of the mucin layer, dead or degenerated
epithelial cells.
Schirmer's test: can be done without a local anesthetic
(Schirmer's I test) or with (Schirmer's II test). For both procedures,
paper strips are placed in each eye for approximately five minutes
to assess aqueous production.
Meibography: examines meibomian gland function.
Fluorophotometry: determines tear turnover rate, tear volume
and tear flow by measuring the decay of fluorescein in the tear film.
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): a scientifically validated
20-question self-diagnostic survey that produces a score based
on commonly recognized symptoms and their severity and helps
patients communicate more effectively with their doctors. |
RPS InflammaDry Detector (Rapid Pathogen Screening):
point-of-care tests that detect for MMP-9, an inflammatory marker
that has been shown to be elevated in the tears of patients with dry
eye disease.
TearLab Osmolarity System: measures tear osmolarity, or the
concentration of tears. The higher the osmolarity, the more likely
the patient has dry eye.
LipiView Ocular Surface Interferometer and the LipiFlow
Thermal Pulsation System (Tear Science): Operating on the
principle of broad-spectrum white light interferometry, it allows a
quantitative analysis of more than one billion data points of the interferometric image of the tear film; this assessment is performed
just prior to the LipiFlow thermal pulsation treatment, a comfortable 12-minute process that evacuates the toxic, altered meibum
found in the meibomian glands of MGD patients.
Touch Tear MicroAssay System (Touch Scientific, Inc.): an
in vitro diagnostic device that is used for the measurement of
lactoferrin concentration in human tears as an aid in the diagnosis
of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and to assess lacrimal gland function. |
There are many causes of ocular
surface irritation and inflammation;
as previously stated, the symptoms
of dry eye are not pathognomonic; i.e., they overlap with many other
conditions. In addition, there is a
well known "disconnect" between
signs and symptoms in dry eye.
To elaborate upon this important
concept: we frequently encounter
patients with the physical findings
of advanced dry eye but with virtually no symptoms. The converse is
also frequently encountered: patients with extreme symptoms and
almost no physical findings at the
slit lamp. I still find that a technician who is a skilled history taker
can be of enormous help to me;
they can shave minutes off each
patient encounter by asking the
right questions and by completing
the necessary testing before I enter
the exam lane.
In general, ophthalmic technicians should suspect dry eye in
anyone 40 years of age or older,
with a previous history of dry eye,
with surface irritation complaints
that might be dry eye, and anyone
who is being worked up for surgery (cataract, LASIK, penetrating
keratoplasty, DSAEK, etc.). The
authors of a recent Japanese study
that evaluated changes in corneal
sensitivity, tear film function, and
ocular surface stability in patients
after phacoemulsification concluded that microscopic ocular surface
damage during surgery seems to be
one of the pathogenic factors that
cause ocular discomfort and dry eye
symptoms after cataract surgery.15
Most dry eye patients complain of
dry, irritable, sandy eyes, with mild
occasional itching. Some patients—
especially those with evaporative
dry eye—also complain of burning.
There also appears to be a correlation between migraines and dry eye,
as one particular study reported that
an increased frequency of dry eye
disease was found to occur in patients with migraine and that some
migraine attacks may be aggravated
in the presence of dry eye.16
One of my favorite questions
for my patients is, "What time of
day do your eyes look and feel
their worst?" If in the evening,
the patient is very likely to have
dry eye. If in the morning, the
patient is very likely to have either
blepharitis or lagophthalmos/exposure keratitis. The last two can be
distinguished by the presence of
redness, crusting, and/or puffiness
(blepharitis) or the presence of
pure redness—and perhaps discomfort—without crusting or puffiness
(lagophthalmos/exposure keratitis).
Most of my patients are office
workers who sit at their desks for a
good part of the day. I tell dry eye
patients to strike a match (assuming they aren't near an oxygen tank
or flammable gases or liquids) just
where their head is located when
they are seated at their desk. If the
flame flickers, they have a draft that
is making their dry eye worse. They
can close the overhead vent with a
broom handle, or ask housekeeping/engineering to close it for them.
They can also ask to be moved
to a draft-free area, or turn their
chair and desk 90˚ to 180˚ so the
draft at least hits the back of their
head. I also advise them to lower
their computer screen as far down
as possible, so that they have less
ocular surface exposed, which leads
to less evaporative tear loss. Lastly,
I tell patients to keep their artificial
tears right next to their keyboard
as a reminder and for ease of use.
Women should also keep a small
magnifying mirror near their keyboard to check their makeup after
application of artificial tears.
Viability of Common Dry Eye Tests |

Adapted from: Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sönmez B, et al. Clinical utility of objectives tests for dry
eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management.
Cornea. 2012; Apr 3. [Epub ahead of print]. |
It is important to counsel patients
who appear to have risk factors
such as blepharitis about proper
care of their eyes and lids. These
are many patients who can prevent
or ameliorate severe dry eye with
proper lid hygiene. Show them the
different types of warm compresses
they can buy over the counter, or
stock and sell some options in your
own clinic.
When conducting any pretesting—or even during the history
taking—it is important to look at
the patient's blink for completeness and blink rate. This factor is a
major contributor to the likelihood
of ocular surface disease.
Once the technician has completed all necessary pre-testing, the
next step is for the dry eye patient to see the physician. At this time,
the staff can assist in further testing
as ordered.
Accurate investigation of dry eye
is crucial to correct management of
the condition and the latest diagnostic tests are invaluable.
Diagnostically Speaking
The availability of rapid, in-office
tear osmolarity testing (TearLab
Osmolarity System, TearLab
Corporation) has made it easier
to diagnose early and/or asymptomatic patients and to track the
response—and compliance—of all
patients who are placed on therapy.
It is important to understand tear
film instability in dry eye disease; in
dry eye patients, osmolarity changes
rapidly over time and between eyes.
In fact, inter-eye variability is the
hallmark of dry eye; greater than
8 mOsms/L is consider abnormal
(Table 2). The tear osmolarity test
is easy and quick for the technician
to perform, and there are no out-of-pocket expenses for the patient,
as it is billed under the patient's
medical plan, not the vision plan.
Table 2. Understanding Tear Film Instability in Dry Eye Disease
- Normal subjects exhibit low and stable osmolarity
- Normal tear osmolarity = 290 mOsms/L
- Equivalent to blood osmolarity = 290 mOsms/L
- Indicative of the tears being held in proper homeostasis
- Dry eye subjects exhibit elevated and unstable osmolarity
- Osmolarity changes between eyes and over time
- Variability is the hallmark of DED (>8 mOsms/L between eyes)
- Osmolarity was found to be the least variable of all common signs1
- Osmolarity: 8.7 percent
- Corneal staining: 12.2 percent
- Conjunctival staining: 14.8 percent
- Meibomian grading: 14.3 percent
- TBUT: 11.7 percent
- Schirmer's Test: 10.7 percent
Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sönmez B, et al. Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over
time and implications for clinical trials and disease management. Cornea. 2012; Apr 3. [Epub ahead of print]. |
Dry eye syndrome is a disease
caused by tears that are inadequate
either in their composition or their
quantity or both. We know that
the pathogenesis of the condition
involves inflammation; the over-expression and over-activity of
corneal matrix metalloproteinase 9
(MMP-9) is a marker for this inflammation. The InflammaDry Detector
from RPS is a rapid, point-of-care
test that is useful in detecting dry
eye because it detects the presence
of MMP- 9 in the tears, which is
elevated in the tears of patients with
dry eye disease.17 Other conditions
may cause MMP-9 to be elevated,
so it is important for the clinician to
take a proper history and to perform
a thorough slit lamp exam. While
this test is not currently available in
the United States, 510(k) review by
the FDA is pending.
The patient's tear film should be
evaluated objectively for both quality and quantity. Besides lubricating
the eye, the tear film helps fight
infection, provides nourishment
and creates a smooth surface on
the cornea, keeping vision clear
by optimizing the eye's optics. A
clinically useful predictor of dry eye
is tear film osmolarity, previously
a difficult test logistically, because
samples needed to be sent to a
laboratory. However, the recent
availability of "lab-on-a-chip" technology such as TearLab has enabled
tear film osmolarity measurement
directly in the office.
Because any eye drops, palpation, contact lenses, manipulation,
bright lights or other disturbances
to the eye can cause reflex tearing,
tear film osmolarity is usually best
evaluated early in the exam, and
thus often falls to the ophthalmic
technician. A disposable probe is
touched to the tear lake at the lower lid margin and a nanoliter-size
sample is collected and analyzed
right there on the chip. The probe
is then placed in a base unit and the
results displayed. Done properly,
the test is quite non-invasive and
reflex tearing can be minimized.
Results of 307 mOsms/L or less are
considered normal, while values
greater than 307 mOsms/L indicate
dry eye. Repeated measurements
over time can help judge treatment efficacy. Also, widely varying
tear film osmolarity between eyes
(greater than 10 mOsms/L difference) is a good indicator of dry eye.
Another recent technological
advance that has shown great promise is the LipiView Ocular Surface
Interferometer from TearScience,
Inc. Their treatment and business
model is predicated on the idea that
most dry eye is evaporative (about
2:1 evaporative to aqueous defi-cient, though there is considerable
overlap between the two types),
and that the majority of the evapo-rative dry eye is due to a deficient
lipid layer in the tear film, which
is in turn most often caused by
MGD.18 The pre-treatment evalua
tion involves the assessment of the
patient's symptoms, oil layer, and
glands. Then, the patient is given
a quick, one-minute questionnaire
to fill out (the SPEED Test). If the
symptoms warrant it, the LipiView
diagnostic system is then utilized.
The LipiView system dynamically
evaluates the thickness of the oily
layer that coats the tear film, which
is mainly composed of meibum. It
also documents the completeness of
the blink, and how the lipid spreads
with each blink. If the quantity or
quality of the lipid layer is found to
be deficient, the meibomian glands
are evaluated for function with mild
pressure from a hand held unit,
the Meibomian Gland Evaluator
(TearScience), which delivers a
standard amount of mild pressure
to the lower lid. Three sections of
both lower lids are tested as part of
the evaluation.
While having fallen out of favor
with some physicians in recent
years because of poor repeatability
and its tendency to induce reflex
tearing, Schirmer testing remains
an accepted tool for evaluating tear
film quantity. Small strips of scored
sterile filter paper are hung over
the lower lids towards the lateral
canthi, and the distance the paper
is wet through capillary action over
a given time (usually 5 minutes) is
recorded. This test may be performed with or without anesthetic.
Without anesthetic it is largely a
measure of reactionary tearing,
while when performed with anesthetic it more closely tracks basal
tearing, though some reactionary
tearing may still occur. Normal basal tearing usually wets a Schirmer
strip between 10 mm to 20 mm in
five minutes time in most people's
eyes. Again, widely disparate data
between the eyes can be indicative
of dry eye. Another similar, though
less invasive, test is the Zone-Quick
Phenol Red Thread (PRT) Tear
Test (FCI Ophthalmics). Instead of
paper strips, this test uses a cotton
thread treated with phenol red dye, which turns red in the presence of
slightly alkaline tears. But its short
measurement time, typically only
10 seconds, has inspired debate as
to how much of the tears recorded
on the thread were already present
in the eye at the test's inception
versus actual tear flow produced
during the test.
The following testing can not
be performed after checking the
patient's intraocular pressure with
direct contact after instilling an eye
drop: tear meniscus height assessment, osmolarity testing, fluorescein
dye and/or lissamine green dye,
tear film break-up time, meibomian
gland expression, Schirmer's tear
test (non anesthetized) in potential Sjogren's patients, Zone-Quick
technology, topography or wavefront
imaging. Take care in making sure
you do not compromise the results
of any testing that may be needed. If the patient has been on a steroid
drop, you much check pressure
before he leaves your office.
A non-contact tonometer that
does not use a numbing drop (which
can still be harsh to the surface of
the eye) is a great addition to an eye
care clinic. Ophthalmic technicians
should assist the physician as they
examine the patient. It is helpful for
staff members to instill various dyes
and drops as needed to continue the
flow of the exam.
Inside the Dry Eye Toolbox
As a staff member in a dry eye
clinic, you should become comfortable with the various options for
treating dry eye that can range from
over-the-counter tears to prescription alternatives. Treatments may
not be limited to drops and can also
include Omega-3 supplements and
long- or short-term oral antibiotic
therapy with agents such as doxycy-cline. These traditional treatments
for dry eye are still effective for
many people.
For cases of mild dry eye, minimizing exposure to exacerbating
environmental factors such as heavy
air conditioning or cigarette smoke,
combined with palliative therapies
such as artificial tears, gels and ointments can be quite effective. And
for people whose dry eye is mainly
evaporative, nutritional therapies such as increasing Omega-3
fatty-acid intake can be similarly
helpful. Many formulas are available, though my favorite is TOZAL
(Atlantic Medical, Inc.), which is by
prescription and covered by most
patients' insurance programs. It is
the formula that NASA developed
for its astronauts, and also contains
lutein and zeaxanthin. For many
with aqueous deficiency, punctual occlusion—be it with plugs or
through cauterization—can bring
great relief. I also continue to use palliative
therapies, including preserved and
unpreserved tears (unpreserved
for the more severe cases); bland
ointments for nighttime use; and
the hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic insert (Lacrisert, Valeant
Ophthalmics) for advanced cases. I frequently recommend liposome
spray q.i.d. OU; this is especially
helpful in evaporative dry eye and
was recently recommended by
the International Task Force on
Meibomian Gland Disease for stage
2 and higher MGD. My favorite is
Tears Again Advanced Liposome
Spray (OCuSOFT, Inc.), which
is available over-the-counter and
carried by several chains, including
CVS. Once again, it is important to
review these therapies one by one,
explain their importance, and to
demonstrate their use with samples;
my technicians are invaluable in
this regard.
If there are enough extant but
poorly functioning or clogged
meibomian glands, the LipiFlow
Thermal Pulsation device (Tear-Science) may be used. This device is a heating and massaging
unit attached to all four lids, and
through gentle pulses of heat and
pressure, the meibomian glands are
expressed and unclogged throughout the 12-minute treatment. The
ability to evaluate, and moreover
treat, evaporative dry eye directly in
the physician's office is a boon, and
largely takes patient compliance
out of the equation. Many patients
are able to stop or greatly reduce their medications and lid hygiene
regimen for months after each Lipi-Flow session; patients are delighted
to abandon their costly medications
and the drudgery of their "soaks
and scrubs" regimen, both of which
lead to non-compliance.
There are some drawbacks:
mainly the procedure's out-of-pocket costs and the current
uncertainty about the duration of
relief the treatment will provide
before needing to be repeated (the
manufacturer states that while most
patients feel better immediately, it
may take one to two months before
reaching its maximum level—a
longer time for more longstanding
cases—and the relief lasts from six
to 36 months, with an average of
18 months). However, everyone
I have spoken to who has had the
procedure said their eyes felt better
(admittedly anecdotal and a limited
sample size). Dr. McDonald has
had the treatment herself, and is
quite impressed with her improvement over the six weeks since treatment. We had been sending our
patients into Manhattan for treatment, but our practice has recently
purchased two of the LipiView/
LipiFlow units, and now we are
offering the treatments to our more
severe dry eye and blepharitis
patients. So far, patients have been
quite pleased with this natural,
"holistic", non-invasive therapy, and
we have had no complications.
Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis, Allergan) was
approved nearly nine years ago; it
was—and still is—the only prescription medication that specifi-cally targets and treats the underlying cause of dry eye. In my opinion,
this first-in-class medication qualifies as a "disruptive technology", as
it radically changed the paradigm
for treating dry eyes; everything
before it was merely palliative. I
tell my patients that it helps them
to produce more of their own tears,
and higher quality tears. The medication is administered b.i.d. from
unit dose unpreserved vials. I usually start cyclosporine with a one-month tapering dose of loteprednol
etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% (Lotemax, Bausch + Lomb)
q.i.d. for two weeks then b.i.d. for
two weeks. This accomplishes two
things: it masks the stinging that sometimes accompanies the first
few weeks of cyclosporine therapy,
and it gives immediate symptomatic
relief. Cyclosporine is very effective
and safe, but it takes the average
patient one month to notice relief;
during that period, the topical
steroid is providing symptomatic
relief. Just as the patient stops the
loteprednol, the cyclosporine effect
will be clinically significant. I rely
heavily on my technicians to explain
how cyclosporine is packaged, how
to use it, when to expect relief, etc.,
as well as why and how the lotepre-dnol is to be used.
Case #1 |
P.M., a 53-year-old female, presented to our office with the chief
complaint of fluctuating vision while at work, which affected her
productivity. She works as a market analyst and is on the computer
for between eight to 10 hours every day. P.M. has a past medical
history that is remarkable: a hysterectomy at age 42, a thyroid-ectomy at age 47, and hypertension for the past three years. Her
systemic medications include raloxifen, metropolol, acetylsalicyclic
acid, levothyroxine, and a multivitamin. She has self-medicated her
condition with artificial tears as needed.
The technician elicited further history: P.M. stated that her
fluctuating vision usually occurs in the afternoon, and rarely on the
weekends. Increasing the font size on her computer monitor has
helped somewhat, but not entirely. Upon further questioning, P.M.
told the technician that the fluctuating vision is often accompanied
by redness and a foreign body sensation. The technician performed
tear osmolarity testing; the readings were 325 mOsms/L and
342 mOsms/L, respectively. The uncorrected visual acuities were
20/40 ad 20/60, best corrected to 20/25 and 20/30 with +0.50
-0.75 x 175˚ and +0.50 -1.00 x 178˚. P.M. required an add of
+2.25 to achieve corrected near acuities of Jaeger 1 in both eyes.
Non-contact tonometry provided intraocular pressures of 12 mmHg
and 13 mmHg.
The ophthalmologist found that P.M. had pupils that were equal,
round, and responsive to light. Extraocular muscle movements
were full and normal.
At the slit lamp, the tear meniscus was very low in both eyes,
and tear break-up time was noted to be three and four seconds,
respectively. Central corneal staining was graded at 1+ OU with
fluorescein, and 2+ to 3+ conjunctival staining was noted with
lissamine green stain. With dilation, 1+ to 2+ nuclear sclerotic
changes were noted, as well as 0.3 cup/disc ratios OU. |
The ophthalmologist diagnosed moderate to severe dry eyes.
She started P.M. on cyclosporine emulsion OU b.i.d.; loteprednol
etabonate OU q.i.d. for two weeks then b.i.d. for two weeks; un-preserved artificial tears every two hours while awake (eight times
a day) and as needed; bland ointment at night OU; and Omega-3
nutritional supplementation. The technician reviewed all the
instructions with the patient, answered questions, and wrote them
on an instruction sheet.
Upon returning five weeks later, P.M. stated to the technician
that her symptoms were approximately 50 percent better. The
technician repeated the tear osmolarity scores, which were
315 mOsms/L and 319 mOsms/L. P.M.'s uncorrected visual
acuities were 20/30 and 20/50; her best-corrected visual acuities
(BCVAs) were 20/20 and 20/25. Slit lamp findings included a low
but improved tear lake in both eyes, as well as a tear break-up
time of 5 and 6 seconds respectively. Central corneal staining with
fluorescein had disappeared, though 1+ to 2+ conjunctival staining
with lissamine green was noted.
As P.M.'s history and exam were both improved but not within normal
limits, four punctal plugs were inserted, and she was asked to continue
her regimen (without the loteprednol etabonate, which had finished).
Upon return six months later, P.M. stated that her symptoms
had resolved. Her tear osmolarity scores were 297 mOsms/L and
305 mOsms/L, and her BCVAs were 20/20 OU. All corneal and con-junctival staining was resolved. The patient was asked to stay on
the same regimen, but was allowed to use gently preserved tears
q.i.d. OU and as needed, instead of unpreserved tears eight times
a day and as needed. The technician reviewed the best choices for
gently preserved tears and provided P.M. with samples. |
Below are the usual guidelines
we follow when treating our dry
eye patients:
For mild level 1 dry eye, as
defined by the Dry Eye Workshop
(DEWS) Report,19 I advise the "as
needed" use of bottled artificial
tears that are gently preserved. One of my favorites is Refresh
Optive Advanced Lubricant Eye
Drops (Allergan, Inc.), which has
the aqueous and lipid components
necessary to treat aqueous deficient
and/or evaporative dry eye. I recommend nutritional supplementation
with TOZAL Eye Health Formula
(Atlantic Medical, Inc.) and the
environmental alterations described
above. I caution them to use wraparound sunglasses to decrease
evaporative tear loss when outdoors,
and to avoid noxious situations
(smoky rooms, etc.). An air cleaner
used indoors to filter dust and other
particles helps to treat dry eyes by
not aggravating them with foreign
bodies, which they are less able to
clear than healthy eyes. Additionally,
a humidifier may also help by adding
moisture into the air.
For level 2 dry eye, I prescribe
all of the above, but I ask the patient to take their artificial tears as
needed on a routine of four times
a day (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and
mid-to-late evening), whether they
think they need them or not.
If the patient is routinely using
tears more than four times a day
(high level 2), I switch them to
preservative-free tears, as the preservative in bottled tears can cause
superficial punctate keratitis (SPK)
if used too often. I also advocate
the use of Tears Again Advanced
Liposome Spray (OCuSOFT, Inc.) q.id. The patient sprays the mist
onto gently closed lids q.id. from
a distance of 8 to 10 inches and
rubs the mist into the lid margins.
Women wearing makeup can spray
in the morning and night with rubbing, and twice in the middle of the
day without rubbing; they will still
get most of the effect. The lipo-somes are studded with vitamins A,
C, and E; with each blink, they migrate into the tear film from the lid
margin and dissolve, spreading lipid
across the superficial layer of the
tear film to prevent evaporation.
At level 2, I also prescribe cyclo-sporine emulsion b.i.d. OU, with the
accompanying one-month tapering
course of loteprednol described
above. The patient is asked to return
in four to eight weeks; if they are
improved but still symptomatic, I
add punctal plugs. Usually I insert
four at once, but if there is any
doubt, I add the lower plugs first.
For those patients, I ask them to
return again in four to eight weeks
to determine if upper plugs are
necessary.
At level 3, I add bland ointment at
night and/or Lacrisert. Some patients
are intolerant/allergic to ointment;
for these patients, I recommend
Genteal Gel (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation). Though it
only lasts four hours at most, these
patients can reapply it at least once in
the middle of the night to achieve the
same effect as ointment, which lasts
approximately eight hours.
At level 4, I add autologous
serum tears and swim goggles at
night, though some patients need
the goggles even during the day.
Some level 4 patients may also need
bland ointment every one to two
hours while awake, in spite of the
fact that it blurs vision. Frequent
trips to the cornea specialist will
also be needed, to remove painful
filaments (long strings composed of
mucous and epithelial cells that are
attached at one end to the cornea;
they move with each blink and
cause great discomfort). A cryopre-served amniotic membrane that is
suspended on a symblepharon ring
(Prokera, Bio-Tissue, Inc.) may also
be inserted in the office when these
patients have exacerbations.
Most level 3 and 4 dry eye patients have at least some element
of MGD as well. I recommend lid
soaks and scrubs b.i.d. as baseline
therapy for all MGD patients. For level 2 MGD and higher, I
prescribe azithromycin solution
(AzaSite, Merck) rubbed into the
lid margins b.i.d., immediately
following the soaks and scrubs. For high level 2 and higher, I often
prescribe doxycycline orally as well.
The usual dose is 20 mg to 50 mg
p.o. q.d., though some patients
need 100 mg p.o. b.i.d. for seven to
10 days before dropping the dose
to 20 to 50 mg p.o. q.d. or b.i.d. I
usually prescribe oral doxycycline
therapy for at least six to 12 months
before attempting to discontinue it.
The Ocudox kit (OCuSOFT, Inc.)
is a great way for patients to get
60 tablets of doxycycline 50 mg,
OCuSOFT lid scrub pads and Tears
Again Advanced Liposome Spray all
in one kit, and is covered by most
patients' insurances. About half of
the level 3 and 4 patients will be
able to discontinue it after a few
months of therapy, saving it for the
occasional flare up (at which point
I give one month of therapy). Some
level 3 and 4 patients are quickly
symptomatic again, and must go
back on low dose oral doxycycline
therapy indefinitely.
The Devil is in the Details
While we certainly do see patients
with newly developed dry eye, most
of the patients with dry eye have had
it for quite some time, often years.
Many have tried treatments in the past, whether prescribed by a doctor
or purchased over the counter.
There is a dizzying array of
artificial tears, gels and ointments
available out there, and inquiry
should be made as to which, if any,
the patient has tried or is using.
There is often a direct correlation
between the frequency of artificial
tear use and severity of dry eye.
A patient using tears every few
hours is likely to have much more
severe dry eye than someone who
uses artificial tears once a week.
And someone using a gel tear or an
ointment is similarly more likely to
have a worse case of dry eye than
someone who is only using aqueous
artificial tears. Additionally, someone who tells you they have tried
various artificial tears but stopped
each one almost immediately
because they didn't experience any
relief is unlikely to keep up with a
new treatment regime unless it provides some immediate relief. This
is one of the reasons many doctors,
Dr. McDonald included, will put
a patient on loteprednol as well as
cyclosporine for the beginning of
the treatment period. Cyclospo-rine often takes months to provide
relief, but loteprednol will usually
give some symptomatic relief im
mediately, giving the cyclosporine
time to be effective at treating the
underlying disease. Alternatively, a
patient who has been using drops
regularly in the past is likely to
comply with a new regimen. Unlike
with hedge funds, when treating
dry eye, past performance is a good
predictor of future results.
Case #2 |
X.R., a 61-year-old male with renal failure, complained of
blurred vision, particularly after dialysis. He was on many medications, including several for hypertension and to induce diuresis. He
told the technician that he had noted blurred and fluctuating vision
since starting dialysis, but it became much worse after the dosage
of some of his medications were increased.
The technician noted tear osmolarity scores of 320 mOsms/L
and 344 mOsms/L, and uncorrected acuities of 20/200 and 20/400.
X.R.'s best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were 20/25 and 20/30
with a manifest refraction of -2.00 + 1.00 X 90˚, and -2.00 + 1.25 x
88˚. His intraocular pressures were 12 mmHg and 14 mmHg.
On examination, the ophthalmologist found that there was a
severely decreased tear lake in both eyes and heavy central and
peripheral staining OU with fluorescein. X.R.'s conjunctivae stained
intensely OU at three- and nine-o'clock with lissamine green.
His tear break-up time was two and three seconds, respectively. |
Dilated examination revealed 2+ to 3+ nuclear sclerotic changes
OU and a cup/disc ratio of 0.3 OU.
Severe dry eyes were diagnosed OU, and treatment was started.
X.R. was put on cyclosporine emulsion OU b.i.d.; loteprednol
etabonate OU q.i.d. for two weeks then b.i.d. for two weeks; un-preserved artificial tears every two hours while awake (eight times
a day) and as needed; bland ointment at night OU; and omega 3
nutritional supplementation. The technician reviewed all the instructions with the patient, and wrote them on an instruction sheet.
The technician also handled numerous questions from X.R.
Upon his return six weeks later, X.R. stated that his blurred
vision was 75 percent better. His tear osmolarity scores were
315 mOsms/L and 311 mOsms/L; BCVAs had improved to 20/20
and 20/25. Tear break-up times had improved to five and seven
seconds. Central staining with fluorescein had resolved, with only
1+ conjunctival staining with lissamine green. Four punctal plugs
were inserted on this visit, and the patient was asked to continue
the same regimen. |
Many patients have never administered an eye drop. Most have
never administered an ointment,
sprayed their lids with a product,
scrubbed their lid margins or
placed a Lacrisert in their inferior
cul de sac. These are therapies
that all require instruction and
demonstration by the technician;
time-consuming, but extremely important tasks that require patience,
kindness and repetition. As with
most things, the devil is in the details; if the patient is not taught the
proper techniques for these therapies, the treatment plan will fail.
Patients should always be told
not to take doxycycline within ±
one hour of a meal containing
dairy products, as dairy inactivates
it. They should also be told that
doxycycline makes them more sun
sensitive, so they should always
wear sunblock, a shirt, wraparound
sunglasses and a hat when outdoors.
After the physician has diagnosed
the patient, you want to be sure to
review the doctor's instructions—
written on an instruction sheet—
with the patient before they leave.
Let them know that they have a
true ocular disease and although it
is chronic, it can be managed, and
that you will watch them closely.
We let patients know that ocular
surface disease conditions can be
managed, so there is hope, but
we also need to remind them that
these are long-term conditions,
so they have to have the proper
expectations.
As mentioned above, write out a
detailed list of all medications and
therapies that the physician would
like to start. Make sure the patient
understands which therapies to
discontinue, which ones they are
to begin, and when to take them.
Take extra time to explain tapering
medications such as steroid drops, as
a slow taper is vital to the success of
the treatment. Encourage patients
to call if they have any decreased
comfort or new/worsened symptoms. It's also a good idea to review
the symptoms of a pressure spike
(extremely unlikely if they follow the
instructions) and tell patients that
if they experience this, they should call immediately. Remind them that
these treatments may take a while to
work—sometimes as long as a few
months. Finally, urge patients to call
if they experience any issues with
medications so you can let the physician know and guide them in how to
discontinue or change medications
in the future.
The Value of Collaboration
While dry eye is rarely a sight-threatening condition, it has a
significant impact on the quality of
our patients' lives and should be
viewed as such. Our dedication to
dry eye has grown our practice, and
it's been a wonderful experience to
see the results as patients who have
suffered for years or decades now
experience—for the first time—relief from dry eye disease. The "doctor-technician-educated patient"
interaction, with the integration of
new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities along with the old, is critical
in the successful treatment of this
challenging condition.
Dr.McDonald is clinical professor of Ophthalmology at New York
University in Manhattan, and is an
adjunct clinical professor of Ophthalmology at Tulane University
Medical School in New Orleans.
She is also in private practice with
Ophthalmic Consultants of Long
Island in Lynbrook, NY.
Mr. Ruskin has a BS in Biology
from Columbia University. He is
currently the technical supervisor for Ophthalmic Consultants
of Long Island's Rockville Centre
office, where he has worked for the
last 15 years
References
- Tomlinson A. Epidemiology of dry eye disease. In: Asbell P, Lemp MA, eds. Dry Eye Disease:
The Clinician's Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment.
New York: Thieme, 2006:1-15.
- National Institutes of Health's National Eye
Institute. Available at: www.nei.nih.gov/health/dry-eye/dryeye.asp#9. (Accessed June 2012).
- Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and
risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol.
2000;118(9):1264-1268.
- Nichols KK, Foulks G, Bron A, et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4.
- Market Scope. Report on the Global Dry Eye
Market. St. Louis, Mo: Market Scope, July 2008.
- Wang TJ, Wang IJ, Hu CC, Lin HC. Comorbidi-ties of dry eye disease: a nationwide population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; Aug. 31.
- Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo
JM, et al. The International Workshop on Meibo-
mian Gland Dysfunction: Report of the Definition
and Classification Subcommittee. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1930-1937.
- Shine WE, McCulley JP. Keratoconjunctivitis
sicca associated with meibomian secretion polar lipid
abnormality. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:849-852.
- Shine WE, McCulley JP. The role of cholesterol
in chronic blepharitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
1991;32:2272-2280.
- Shine WE, McCulley JP. Role of wax ester
fatty alcohols in chronic blepharitis. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3515-3521.
- Shine WE, McCulley JP. Polar lipids in
human meibomian secretions. Curr Eye Res.
2003;26:89-94.
- Craig J, Tomlinson A. Importance of the lipid
layer in human tear film stability and evaporation.
Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:8-13.
- Interim Analysis: TearLab Prevalence Study.
- Mertzanis P, Abetz L, Rajagopalan K, et al.
The relative burden of dry eye in patients' lives:
comparison to a U.S. normative sample. Invest
Ophthalmol. 2005;46(1):46-50.
- Oh T, Jung Y, Chang D, et al. Changes in the
tear film and ocular surface after cataract surgery.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;65(2):113-8.
- Koktekir BE, Celik G, Karalezli A, Kal A. Dry
eyes and migraines: is there really a correlation?
Cornea. 2012;Jun 15. [Epub ahead of print].
- Chotikavanich S, de Paiva CS, Li de Quan,
et al. Production and activity of matrix metal-loproteinase-9 on the ocular surface increase in
dysfunctional tear syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
Sci. 2009 Jul; 50(7):3203-9.
- Shimazaki J, Sakata M, Tsuboto K. Ocular
Surface Changes and Discomfort in Patients With
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Arch Ophthalmol.
1995;113(10):1266-1270.
- 2007 Report of the Dry Eye WorkShop
(DEWS) (Ocul Surf. 2007;5[2]:65-204). .